governance by experts
Call me stubborn and dogmatic, but I hold the concept and execution of a liberal democracy in pretty goddamn high regard. These environmentalists…not so much. Hey, at least they’ve come clean.
There must be open minds to look critically at liberal democracy. Reform must involve the adoption of structures to act quickly regardless of some perceived liberties.
…
We are going to have to look how authoritarian decisions based on consensus science can be implemented to contain greenhouse emissions.
Time to install the eco-high priests, eh? Someone convince me that environmentalism is nothing more than neo-socialism.
Not convinced that these nutjobs really want to become enviro-socialist dictators? Let’s see what their book page has to say about their conclusion.
Nevertheless, the authors conclude that an authoritarian form of government is necessary, but this will be governance by experts and not by those who seek power.
Governance by ‘experts’ and not_those_who_seek_power… Where have seen this before?
